Changing Women and Avoiding Men Gender Stereotypes and Reproductive Health Programmes
Identifieur interne : 001166 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001165; suivant : 001167Changing Women and Avoiding Men Gender Stereotypes and Reproductive Health Programmes
Auteurs : Margaret E. GreeneSource :
- IDS Bulletin [ 0265-5012 ] ; 2000-04.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Address gender inequities, Anthropological literature, Behaviour, Biddlecom, Biological children, Birth control, Contraceptive, Contraceptive prevalence, Cornelius debpuur, Demographic goals, Demographic imperatives, Demographic research, Development review, Family health, Family planning, Family planning programmes, Female sterilisation, Fertility, Fertility control, Fertility decline, Gender, Gender dynamics, Gender equity, Gender inequities, Gender relations, Gender roles, Gender stereotypes, Health programmes, High fertility, Icpd, Icpd programme, Inequity, International family planning perspectives, International family planning programmes, Male involvement, Male involvement programmes, Many programmes, Many settings, Marital infidelity, More attention, Nancy grandjean, Northern ghana, Northern thailand, Other areas, Oxford university press, Population council, Population field, Population policies, Population policy, Population stabilisation, Power relations, Primary responsibility, Programmatic implications, Programme, Reproductive, Reproductive health, Reproductive health field, Reproductive health programmes, Reproductive health services, Sexuality, Sidney ruth, Social change, Social circumstances, Social organisation, Social science, Strong assumptions, Studies project.
- Teeft :
- Address gender inequities, Anthropological literature, Behaviour, Biddlecom, Biological children, Birth control, Contraceptive, Contraceptive prevalence, Cornelius debpuur, Demographic goals, Demographic imperatives, Demographic research, Development review, Family health, Family planning, Family planning programmes, Female sterilisation, Fertility, Fertility control, Fertility decline, Gender, Gender dynamics, Gender equity, Gender inequities, Gender relations, Gender roles, Gender stereotypes, Health programmes, High fertility, Icpd, Icpd programme, Inequity, International family planning perspectives, International family planning programmes, Male involvement, Male involvement programmes, Many programmes, Many settings, Marital infidelity, More attention, Nancy grandjean, Northern ghana, Northern thailand, Other areas, Oxford university press, Population council, Population field, Population policies, Population policy, Population stabilisation, Power relations, Primary responsibility, Programmatic implications, Programme, Reproductive, Reproductive health, Reproductive health field, Reproductive health programmes, Reproductive health services, Sexuality, Sidney ruth, Social change, Social circumstances, Social organisation, Social science, Strong assumptions, Studies project.
Abstract
Summaries Health care researchers have documented that in many settings male social prerogatives powerfully condition women's relationship to health care systems. Particularly in the area of reproductive health care, the decision‐making privileges enjoyed by men fundamentally affect women's health status. Yet population policy and reproductive health programming has been slow to respond to this insight. Unrecognized or unacknowledged assumptions about women's ‘natural’ responsibility for childbearing and child‐rearing, coupled with an acceptance of the rights of men to make family health care decisions have impeded policy responses to these research findings. By accepting these static characterisations of men rather than assuming that gender relations are dynamic and that men are as capable of change as women, research and programmes have often implicitly accepted men's power and women's subordination. Effective reproductive health care programming needs to recruit men's support and participation in creative ways.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2000.mp31002007.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000939
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000939
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000683
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001247
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001166
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Changing Women and Avoiding Men Gender Stereotypes and Reproductive Health Programmes</title><author><name sortKey="Greene, Margaret E" sort="Greene, Margaret E" uniqKey="Greene M" first="Margaret E." last="Greene">Margaret E. Greene</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:02A9C67BA62A1EB812942C75A31AA6F8D56DD406</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1759-5436.2000.mp31002007.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/02A9C67BA62A1EB812942C75A31AA6F8D56DD406/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000939</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000939</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000939</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000683</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000683</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0265-5012:2000:Greene M:changing:women:and</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001247</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001166</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001166</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Changing Women and Avoiding Men <hi rend="italic">Gender Stereotypes and Reproductive Health Programmes</hi></title><author><name sortKey="Greene, Margaret E" sort="Greene, Margaret E" uniqKey="Greene M" first="Margaret E." last="Greene">Margaret E. Greene</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">IDS Bulletin</title><title level="j" type="alt">IDS BULLETIN</title><idno type="ISSN">0265-5012</idno><idno type="eISSN">1759-5436</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="49">49</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="59">59</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Institute of Development Studies</publisher><pubPlace>University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RE, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-04">2000-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0265-5012</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0265-5012</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Address gender inequities</term><term>Anthropological literature</term><term>Behaviour</term><term>Biddlecom</term><term>Biological children</term><term>Birth control</term><term>Contraceptive</term><term>Contraceptive prevalence</term><term>Cornelius debpuur</term><term>Demographic goals</term><term>Demographic imperatives</term><term>Demographic research</term><term>Development review</term><term>Family health</term><term>Family planning</term><term>Family planning programmes</term><term>Female sterilisation</term><term>Fertility</term><term>Fertility control</term><term>Fertility decline</term><term>Gender</term><term>Gender dynamics</term><term>Gender equity</term><term>Gender inequities</term><term>Gender relations</term><term>Gender roles</term><term>Gender stereotypes</term><term>Health programmes</term><term>High fertility</term><term>Icpd</term><term>Icpd programme</term><term>Inequity</term><term>International family planning perspectives</term><term>International family planning programmes</term><term>Male involvement</term><term>Male involvement programmes</term><term>Many programmes</term><term>Many settings</term><term>Marital infidelity</term><term>More attention</term><term>Nancy grandjean</term><term>Northern ghana</term><term>Northern thailand</term><term>Other areas</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Population council</term><term>Population field</term><term>Population policies</term><term>Population policy</term><term>Population stabilisation</term><term>Power relations</term><term>Primary responsibility</term><term>Programmatic implications</term><term>Programme</term><term>Reproductive</term><term>Reproductive health</term><term>Reproductive health field</term><term>Reproductive health programmes</term><term>Reproductive health services</term><term>Sexuality</term><term>Sidney ruth</term><term>Social change</term><term>Social circumstances</term><term>Social organisation</term><term>Social science</term><term>Strong assumptions</term><term>Studies project</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Address gender inequities</term><term>Anthropological literature</term><term>Behaviour</term><term>Biddlecom</term><term>Biological children</term><term>Birth control</term><term>Contraceptive</term><term>Contraceptive prevalence</term><term>Cornelius debpuur</term><term>Demographic goals</term><term>Demographic imperatives</term><term>Demographic research</term><term>Development review</term><term>Family health</term><term>Family planning</term><term>Family planning programmes</term><term>Female sterilisation</term><term>Fertility</term><term>Fertility control</term><term>Fertility decline</term><term>Gender</term><term>Gender dynamics</term><term>Gender equity</term><term>Gender inequities</term><term>Gender relations</term><term>Gender roles</term><term>Gender stereotypes</term><term>Health programmes</term><term>High fertility</term><term>Icpd</term><term>Icpd programme</term><term>Inequity</term><term>International family planning perspectives</term><term>International family planning programmes</term><term>Male involvement</term><term>Male involvement programmes</term><term>Many programmes</term><term>Many settings</term><term>Marital infidelity</term><term>More attention</term><term>Nancy grandjean</term><term>Northern ghana</term><term>Northern thailand</term><term>Other areas</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Population council</term><term>Population field</term><term>Population policies</term><term>Population policy</term><term>Population stabilisation</term><term>Power relations</term><term>Primary responsibility</term><term>Programmatic implications</term><term>Programme</term><term>Reproductive</term><term>Reproductive health</term><term>Reproductive health field</term><term>Reproductive health programmes</term><term>Reproductive health services</term><term>Sexuality</term><term>Sidney ruth</term><term>Social change</term><term>Social circumstances</term><term>Social organisation</term><term>Social science</term><term>Strong assumptions</term><term>Studies project</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Régulation des naissances</term><term>Planification de la famille</term><term>Fécondité</term><term>Politique démographique</term><term>Santé génésique</term><term>Sexualité</term><term>Changement social</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Summaries Health care researchers have documented that in many settings male social prerogatives powerfully condition women's relationship to health care systems. Particularly in the area of reproductive health care, the decision‐making privileges enjoyed by men fundamentally affect women's health status. Yet population policy and reproductive health programming has been slow to respond to this insight. Unrecognized or unacknowledged assumptions about women's ‘natural’ responsibility for childbearing and child‐rearing, coupled with an acceptance of the rights of men to make family health care decisions have impeded policy responses to these research findings. By accepting these static characterisations of men rather than assuming that gender relations are dynamic and that men are as capable of change as women, research and programmes have often implicitly accepted men's power and women's subordination. Effective reproductive health care programming needs to recruit men's support and participation in creative ways.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Greene, Margaret E" sort="Greene, Margaret E" uniqKey="Greene M" first="Margaret E." last="Greene">Margaret E. Greene</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/SidaGhanaV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001166 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001166 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= SidaGhanaV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:02A9C67BA62A1EB812942C75A31AA6F8D56DD406
|texte= Changing Women and Avoiding Men Gender Stereotypes and Reproductive Health Programmes
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |